Since my last post there has been a big
blowback directed at Corey Goode and David Wilcock of “Cosmic
Disclosure” on Gaia TV website for not providing any real
supporting evidence for the claims made in their show.
I’m not going to get into that here,
except to say that I have found more careful, evidence supported
analysis from others – and thus for this episode, the few who get
good scores from me.
First, Richard Dolan. Richard
has a good analytical approach to the whole “UFO Scene” - he has
a lot to say and it’s carefully though out.
Plenty of Youtube vids
to get you started, then
Richard is one person who has expressed
skepticism about Corey Goode and his associates, and noted what
appears to be a lot of connections to the “new age” ideology,
none of which seems to me to have any supporting evidence either. I
did try to watch a video where Corey apparently replied to the
criticisms of his work but I just could not watch it – it was just too
awful and slow for me.
Next. Joseph P. Farrell. Joseph
is generous in his provision of information – he is a very
competent researcher and has assembled impressive information on
aspects of the UFO field that look very accurate and clear –
particularly since he takes the sort of approach that I appreciate:
both the social, historical and technical all meshing together to
make a coherent picture.
Here is one example of Joseph on a
radio show- there are a lot of vids of him on Youtube.
This is Joseph’s website:
Yes, I know the title sounds new-agey
but check out his vids, you won’t be disappointed.
His books also appear on Adventures
Unlimited Press website run by David Hatcher Childress, another
author well known for his works in this field. To be honest, I am not
sure what to think about David, I'll leave that up to you - but he does have a lot of books etc. for sale.
Finally, the place where almost all of
the UFO/Altsci people can be found, Project Camelot.
Note that the folk running Project
Camelot are careful not to offer critique of anyone who may appear
wit hwild tales, but rather they seek to document and record these
people – so that you can judge for yourself, and there are a LOT of
interviews on the Camelot site - so I really cannot give it a rating: each perosn interviewed must be judged individually.
No comments:
Post a Comment